Agenda item

The Committee will be joined by Mr John Ray and Mr Andrew Haigh, Senior Advisors with the Environment Agency.

Minutes:

The Chairman introduced Mr John Ray and Mr Andrew Haigh of the Environment Agency. She explained the initial invite to the Environment Agency had been made in the summer of 2019 and the purpose of inviting them had been to understand their roles and how to work together in times of need. She added that since making the first approach, there had since been several instances of flooding across the district and so there was an additional need to understand what had happened and how the Agency was working to reduce the risk of such incidents being repeated. She then handed the floor to Mr Ray and Mr Haigh.

 

Mr Ray introduced them both as Senior Flood Risk Advisors with the Environment Agency and although they covered different areas, West Lindsey sat in both catchments. He added that they had been provided with a brief for the evening, including a selection of pre-prepared questions and so in their presentation they had attempted to answer those questions. It was agreed that their presentation would be made available to Members after the meeting.

 

Members heard details of those involved with flood management including county councils, internal drainage boards, district councils and water and sewerage companies. Reference was also made to riparian landowners and the important role they could play in watercourse maintenance and oversight. The Committee was shown a map highlighting the area of West Lindsey, the split of the Environment Agency areas and the rivers and waterways covered within the district.

 

Information was given regarding the work undertaken by the Environment Agency including capital improvement projects (such as flood storage reservoirs and the Witham embankment strengthening), intermittent maintenance and the annual programme of maintenance. It was explained that aside from meteorological influences, the Agency also had to contend with ongoing difficulties such as badgers burrowing in embankments which, if left unchecked, could cause serious weaknesses in natural flood defences.

 

Members had specifically raised the issue of dredging, or de-silting, and whether the approach to this had changed in recent years. Mr Ray explained that the cost of such work was not always reflected in the result. He added that, where it would impact for example the workings of a flood defence structure, it would be routinely carried out to ensure the efficacy of the flood defence. In areas where it was not proven to have any significant benefit, dredging often proved too expensive. He noted that, as a result of recent floods, the Government had announced funding of £4billion nationwide and he demonstrated the improvement works this would effect for West Lindsey.

 

Mr Ray handed over to Mr Haigh who detailed the geographical area he covered and the programme of works which had been completed over recent years. There were many similarities in terms of routine maintenance and regular inspections however he stated there was increased inspection work underway at Morton as there were identified areas where the banks were lower and therefore at increased risk of flooding. Mr Haigh also provided Members with details of the capital improvement programme for his area including the finances involved with this.

 

Mr Ray clarified for Members that the Agency had bid for additional funding following the recent flooding but it would not be known whether the bid had been successful until April. The planned work across the capital improvement programmes would go ahead however if the funding bid was successful, it would prove a major boost to the completion of such work.

 

There was explanation regarding the role of Lincolnshire County Council and their responsibility for surface water, ground water flooding and unlisted waterways. It was explained that the County Council was responsible for investigating incidents of flooding and would look for recommendations or ameliorative actions where possible.

 

Members heard that funding was based on protection of population rather than land and this impacted where the money was spent. It was explained that local authorities could carry out their own protections but funding was similarly a difficulty. Landowners also held responsibility for their own properties meaning they could carry out protective works however it was necessary for this to be taken into consideration with the Environment Agency to ensure there would be no adverse effects further down the waterway. Mr Ray stated that 2020 would see concerted efforts to communicate with landowners to explain this and offer advice where necessary.

 

To conclude their presentation, Mr Ray and Mr Haigh explained that the investigations following recent flooding events were ongoing and it was therefore not yet possible to advise of what changes may be made as a result. They did reiterate that additional funding had been applied for but it would be several weeks before it was known if this would be successful. They thanked the Committee for the opportunity to attend and invited questions from Members.

 

The Chairman thanked Mr Ray and Mr Haigh for their time and thoroughness of their presentation. She spoke on behalf of West Lindsey District Councillors who had experienced flooding in their areas to say they had seen difficult times for their residents and it was important to understand what more could be done to assist those affected and to make attempts to prevent the same happening again.

 

Note:              Councillor A. Lawrence left the room at 7:39pm

 

Members of the Committee started discussions by relaying specific incidents that had occurred in their areas. It was confirmed that these difficulties were known to the Environment Agency and there would be ongoing investigations.

 

Note:              Councillor A. Lawrence returned at 7:44pm

 

There was further discussion regarding specific areas and the importance of liaising with Parish Councils. This was agreed with by Mr Ray and Mr Haigh and they explained that they were attending Parish Council meetings of those areas recently affected.

 

Note:              Councillor L. Strange left the room at 7:47pm

 

The Interim Assistant Director of Operations, who had been co-ordinating the council’s actions and response to the flooding highlighted the work the council had already undertaken and the communications which had taken place between West Lindsey District Council, Lincolnshire County Council and the Environment Agency. It was acknowledged that communication was vital, not only between relevant organisations but also within each organisation to ensure information was as open and accessible as possible.

 

Note:              Councillor L. Strange returned at 7:53pm

 

There were further questions from Councillors regarding incidents of flooding in their areas with Mr Ray and Mr Haigh addressing each one in relation to the problem faced and solutions offered. They emphasised that no area had been sacrificed for the sake of other areas however, the focus was on protection of life rather than land.

 

Note:              Councillor L. Clews left the room at 8:02pm and returned at 8:04pm.

                        Councillor K. Panter left the meeting at 8:04pm

 

Members of the Committee continued discussions regarding the increased rate of flooding over recent years and it was confirmed that the likelihood of floods occurring had increased. It was emphasised that surface water flooding was far more difficult to predict and address as there were so many aspects which impacted this. It was reiterated that the council could have an influence, for example with planning applications, but there was no instant answer on how to deal with surface water issues. 

 

Following concluding remarks from the Chairman, reiterating the importance of good communication across all parties, including Parish Councils and local residents, she thanked Mr Ray and Mr Haigh again for their time, detailed presentation and willingness to discuss such important matters with those involved.

 

Note:              The meeting was adjourned at 8:25pm.

 

Supporting documents: