Agenda item

The third application of the evening was introduced. Application number 140906 for change of use from water storage tank to single family dwelling on land off Caistor Lane, Tealby. Members heard there were no updates and, having seen the Officer presentation, the Chairman invited the first speaker to address the Committee.

Laura McMullan, Agent for the Applicant, made the following statement.

“Evening Chair, Thank you for the opportunity to speak this evening.

As you are aware we are applying for permission to re?use an existing redundant water tank and convert this into a single dwelling. We are seeking permission for the dwelling under paragraph 79 of the NPPF. The NPPF states that in order for the application to be approved that it must meet the criteria of section c of paragraph 79

which states that:

c) the development would re?use redundant or disused buildings and enhance its immediate setting;

To ensure that we have achieved alignment with paragraph 79 we consulted an external design panel, as requested by West Lindsey planning department, to review the proposals who are experts in the analysis and critiquing projects with regards to paragraph 79 applications.

The response from the design review panel praised the design and how it was deeply rooted in the history and context of the site and also state that it is a ‘bold and convincing response to the existing structure on the plot and is a positive contribution to the site.

During the planning process we have then clarified further points with the planner to ensure we align with paragraph 79, these were submitted in an addendum document.

We whole heartedly believe we meet the criteria set out by paragraph 79 as the building has a positive impact on the landscape and its visibility from the surrounding areas evokes intrigue which ultimately arouses more questions around the history and context of the site. The revised landscaping proposals are also a great improvement on the current grassed, over grown mound and metal fencing. The site is littered with electrical boxes and industrial equipment which doesn’t have a positive impact on the landscape. The current concrete post and barbed wire fencing also have a negative impact on the landscape whilst our proposals seek to soften the edge of the site and blend harmoniously with the surrounding context. Not only do we comply with section c of paragraph 79 we also exceed the requirements by also complying with section e with regards to raising standards of design in rural areas.

The reason we are here is to ask the committee do you agree that the current proposals are reusing an existing redundant structure and enhancing its immediate setting. We have demonstrated that we are in complete alignment with paragraph 79 section c of the NPPF. Through the use of design reviews, written documentation, 2D and 3D drawings.

We thank you for your involvement in this process and are open to answer any further questions from the floor.”

The Chairman clarified questions were not permitted however thanked Ms McMullen for her time.

There was significant discussion regarding the benefit to the local area versus the potential impact on the rural location. It was noted that there had been no objections raised from the AONB Officer and there was assent that the design and addition to the area would be beneficial.

The Chairman commented that, whilst it was an interesting and innovative design, it was not suitable to the rural location and so he moved the Officer recommendation to refuse permission. This was seconded and so the Chairman conducted a vote. With the majority vote against the recommendation, the proposal to refuse permission was lost.

Having been moved and seconded for the application to be agreed under paragraph 79 of the NPPF, the Chairman undertook a second vote. With the majority vote, it was agreed for planning permission to be GRANTED subject to conditions as provided by the Officer.